Base price and pricing structure
Contractor proposal review
Contractor bid comparison software for facility projects
Scope-to-Go brings contractor proposals into one reviewable structure so facility managers can understand important differences before award.
Put the details that change project cost and risk in one place.
Included work and deliverables
Exclusions and assumptions
Schedule and completion dates
Warranty terms
Allowances, alternates, and missing information
With a common SOW
Review compliance against the work you requested.
Upload the controlling Scope of Work with contractor proposals to identify omissions, different interpretations, and questions that should be resolved before award.
Without a common SOW
Compare differences without pretending they prove compliance.
Bid-to-Bid Comparison can organize proposal differences when no owner scope exists, with a clear limitation that the comparison cannot prove a bid is complete.
The platform organizes the evidence. You make the decision.
Automated extraction can be incomplete or incorrect. Scope-to-Go keeps original proposals visible, requires facility-manager verification, and supports focused contractor clarifications. It does not select a winner or replace technical, procurement, legal, or financial review.
Choose manual comparison or assisted proposal extraction.
Starter includes manual comparison at $49/month. Professional ($169/month) and Portfolio ($499/month) add assisted proposal extraction. Optional standalone Bid-to-Bid offers are priced separately.
Before you choose a workflow
Can I compare bids without a common Scope of Work?
Yes. Optional Bid-to-Bid Comparison can organize differences without a common owner scope, but that comparison cannot establish whether a bid satisfies an unstated scope.
Which plan reads proposal PDFs?
Professional and Portfolio include assisted proposal extraction. Check extracted prices, scope, exclusions and terms against the original document before verifying the proposal.
Does the lowest price automatically win?
No. Resolve excluded work and unknown costs, compare the same requirements, and consider supported schedule, warranty and long-term cost evidence. The facility manager remains responsible for the decision.